天网
网友收到“四川长宁7.7级”地震预警，中国地震局回应三方面问题_我的网站
一 | 月24日8时26分，四川宜宾市长宁县发生4.7级地震。
The yen has weakened in recent days, edging closer to the psychologically important 160 level against the US dollar. The decline comes despite the widely watched move by Washington to join Tokyo in supporting the currency. Less than two weeks after the US-Japan intervention, the yen has given up roughly half of its gains, raising fresh questions over the effectiveness of coordinated efforts to stabilize the exchange rate.
Japan and the US had previously confirmed coordinated foreign exchange intervention to prop up the yen after the currency tumbled to a nearly 40-year low. At the time, some observers saw the move as potentially stabilizing the yen in the short term, although its longer-term impact remained uncertain.
However, the subsequent market reaction suggests that even the short-term effect may have been limited. After strengthening to about 155 per dollar in the days following the intervention from above 163, the yen had slipped back above 159 by Wednesday, less than two weeks later.
Questions have emerged over whether further support for the yen may soon be needed, and whether Washington would consider stepping in again. The previous intervention was seen by some observers as a test of market confidence: the unusual coordinated move had the potential to influence market expectations and discourage bets against the yen. But if market expectations remain largely unchanged, repeated interventions could deliver diminishing returns. The US may face a difficult trade-off. Another intervention could require greater resources and come at a higher cost, while refraining from further action could raise questions over the lasting impact of the previous effort.
Market commentary has added to the uncertainty. Axios published a report headlined "Yen's weakness shows market isn't done pushing," while some reports suggested that the impact of the US-Japan intervention was beginning to fade. Such narratives could weigh on sentiment toward the yen and reinforce market expectations that the currency's weakness may persist.
Washington's involvement in supporting the yen may reflect broader economic and policy considerations. These could include avoiding a scenario in which Japan sells US Treasury holdings to support the currency, as well as concerns that a weaker yen could give Japanese exporters a greater competitive advantage. These possible considerations suggest that the intervention alone does not fully address the underlying forces behind the yen's weakness. This may help explain why the market has so far been reluctant to view the move as a turning point for the currency.
Washington's decision to join the intervention may have reflected concerns, as some observers suggest, that the yen's prolonged weakness had begun to affect US interests. If markets remain unconvinced by the US-Japan intervention, one possible outcome is that Washington could push Japan to take more costly measures to support the yen. Such a scenario could instead create some strain between Washington and Tokyo.
Beyond short-term market dynamics, the yen's weakness also reflects deeper challenges facing the Japanese economy, making a sustained reversal difficult. The currency's prolonged weakness has been influenced by the interest rate gap between Japan and the US, while also reflecting longer-term concerns over the diminishing returns of Japan's traditional growth model.
This leaves Japan facing a delicate policy balance between supporting growth and stabilizing the currency. While lower interest rates could help boost economic activity, continued weakness in the yen may strengthen calls for Japan's central bank to consider further rate increases to narrow the interest rate gap with the US.
Japan's structural challenges mean that a sustained appreciation of the yen will not be easy to achieve. The question of whether to pursue stronger measures, even at the cost of some economic growth, has become more complicated as the US takes a role in the issue. Japan may face greater pressure to support the currency, even though doing so would be difficult and could carry broader economic costs.
The author is a reporter with the Global Times. [email protected]
。中国地震预警网震后6秒通过微信小程序、华为手机、小米手机和地震预警专用终端等渠道，向震中周边区域1000余万用户推送了官方地震预警信息。此事引发公众广泛关注。今天，中国地震局针对三方面问题进行回应：中国地震局表示，震后，成都高新减灾研究所擅自利用其自建系统生成“四川长宁7.7级”地震预警信息，以“中国地震预警网”的名义，通过荣耀、vivo、魅族品牌手机及小天才手表等终端违规向全国用户推送。
二 | 第三方机构是否可以播发地震预警信息？地震预警信息属于震情信息，根据《中华人民共和国防震减灾法》第五十二条规定，震情信息应当由地震部门统一发布。地震部门持续扩大地震预警信息服务覆盖面，积极引导社会力量有序参与地震预警信息服务。第三方机构在技术评估和试运行合格后，经与地震部门签订协议，可向公众播发中国地震预警网统一产出的地震预警信息。目前已与华为、小米、腾讯以及部分广电企业等30家市场主体签订合作协议，向公众用户提供地震预警信息服务。
三 | 通过签订合作协议的方式，成都高新减灾研究所自2023年、2025年起，在四川、新疆地区开展地震预警信息播发服务，合作协议明确信息来源仅限中国地震预警网。在其他省份，地震部门未与其签订地震预警信息播发合作协议。
四 | 近年来，成都高新减灾研究所多次向社会违规播发地震预警信息。2026年以来，先后在浙江、陕西、宁夏、山西、河南等地多次违规播发自建系统产出的地震预警信息。地震部门多次约谈成都高新减灾研究所，并要求严肃整改。由于其未整改到位，7月22日四川省地震局终止了与成都高新减灾研究所的播发地震预警信息协议。如何规范地震预警信息第三方播发行为？截至目前，四川、重庆、广东、陕西等27个省份出台了地震预警地方性法规和政府规章，明确规定地震预警信息由省级地震主管部门统一发布，任何单位和个人不得擅自向社会发布预警信息。为规范地震预警信息第三方播发行为，地震部门采取了以下措施：一是完善制度建设。推动防震减灾法修订，增加地震预警管理和服务的相关条款；起草第三方服务规范性文件，出台地震预警服务相关技术标准和业务制度，逐步构建地震预警规制体系。
五 | 二是加强服务监管。公开地震预警信息接入技术测试评估体系，规范第三方接入流程。建立统一技术监管平台，确保服务全程可溯、安全可控。制定服务负面清单，及时处置违规行为。三是秉持公益导向。明确地震部门不得向第三方服务单位收取地震预警信息费用，要求合作单位不得向公众收取地震预警信息费用，确保地震预警最大限度惠及人民群众。
六 | 公众可以从哪些渠道获取官方地震预警信息？公众可通过中国地震台网中心和各省级地震局官方微信小程序、华为手机、小米手机和地震预警专用终端等获取权威地震预警信息。此外，四川、云南、河北等部分地区也可通过IPTV等广播电视渠道获取权威地震预警信息。（央视新闻）。
七 |
Current article:http://is0ps.piepengxikuozhuangzebaohouye.sbs/aslci/eatqk9.html
Published on:08:56:05